The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) is a 10-item self-report scale evaluating symptoms of chronic fatigue. The FAS treats fatigue as a unidimensional construct and does not separate its measurement into different factors. However, in order to ensure that the scale evaluates all aspects of fatigue, it measures both physical and mental symptoms.
Fatigue is a major problem in a wide range of (chronic) diseases and is the most frequently described symptom and is globally recognised as a disabling symptom. Fatigue is defined as “an experience of tiredness, dislike of present activity, and unwillingness to continue”, or as a “disinclination to continue performing the task at hand and a progressive withdrawal of attention” from environmental demands.
As a gradual and cumulative process, fatigue reflects vigilance decrement and decreased capacity to perform, along with subjective states that are associated with this decreased performance. It is a general psychophysiological phenomenon that diminishes the ability of the individual to perform a particular task by altering alertness and vigilance, together with the motivational and subjective states that occur during this transition. Consequently, there is reduced competence and willingness to develop or maintain goal directed behaviour aimed at adequate performance.
This scale can be useful in tracking fatigue over time in the context of psychiatric conditions, physical illness or chronic fatigue syndrome.
The FAS has an internal consistency of .90 (Michielsen, De Vries, & Van Heck, 2003). Results on the scale also correlated highly with the fatigue-related subscales of other measures like the Checklist Individual Strength (Vercoulen et al., 1999).
For 351 adults between the ages of 21 and 65 who worked 20 or more hours per week, the mean score was 19.26 (SD = 6.52) (Michielsen et al., 2003).
The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with a higher score indicating more severe fatigue.
A normative percentile for the total score is calculated based on an adult sample (Michielsen et al., 2003), indicating how the respondent scored in relation to a typical pattern of responding for adults. For example, a percentile of 90 indicates the individual has more fatigue than 90 percent of the normal population.
Scores above 22 represent significant fatigue (De Vries et al., 2004), which corresponds to a normative percentile of 65. A horizontal dotted line is indicated on the Total Percentile graph for this cutoff score.
A description of the fatigue experienced is presented for the total score where:
There are two subscales:
Michielsen, H. J., De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2003). Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure the fatigue assessment scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54, 345–352.
De Vries, Michielsen H, Van Heck GL, Drent M. Measuring fatigue in sarcoidosis: the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Br J Health Psychol 2004; 9: 279-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15296678
Hendriks, C., Drent, M., Elfferich, M., & De Vries, J. (2018). The Fatigue Assessment Scale: quality and availability in sarcoidosis and other diseases. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 24(5), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000000496
Vercoulen J. H. M. M., Alberts, M., & Bleijenberg, G. (1999). De checklist individual strength (CIS). Gedragstherapie, 32, 131-136.